Women's 207 Vintage Corduroy Pants, High-Rise Wide-Leg

Item #: CA523740
5 out of 5 Customer Rating
Women's 207 Vintage Corduroy Pants, High-Rise Wide-Leg is rated 4.5 out of 5 by 313.
  • y_2026, m_4, d_1, h_12
  • bvseo_bulk, prod_bvrr, vn_bulk_3.0.43
  • cp_1, bvpage1
  • co_hasreviews, tv_0, tr_313
  • loc_en_CA, sid_P-130208, prod, sort_[SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING)]
  • clientName_llbeanca
  • bvseo_sdk, dw_cartridge, 21.1.0, p_sdk_3.2.0
  • CLOUD, getAggregateRating, 7ms
  • reviews, product
C$ 145 {"sales":{"value":145,"currency":"CAD","formatted":"C$ 145","decimalPrice":"145"},"list":null}
Women's 207 Vintage Corduroy Pants, High-Rise Wide-Leg, Bone, large
C$ 145 {"sales":{"value":145,"currency":"CAD","formatted":"C$ 145","decimalPrice":"145"},"list":null}
FREE Shipping with C$ 100 Purchase
Color C$ 145: Bone
Please select color
Sale Color C$ 122:
Please select color
Sale Color C$ 108:
Please select color
Item: Regular
Please select customcut
Size:
Please select size
Inseam:
Please select inseam
Size Chart
Limited quantity
Women's 207 Vintage Corduroy Pants, High-Rise Wide-Leg, Bone, small
C$ 145 {"sales":{"value":145,"currency":"CAD","formatted":"C$ 145","decimalPrice":"145"},"list":null}
Unable to process your transaction. Please try again later or give us a call at 800-349-9130.
In-store Availability: Select options (ex.: size or color)

Product Details

Washed for lived-in softness and vintage appeal, these premium wide-leg cords are incredibly durable, hardworking and feel like forever favorites from the start.

  • Relaxed through hip and thigh.
  • Inseams: Regular 28", Petite 26", Medium Tall 30", Plus 28".
  • High-Rise (Classic Fit): Sits at waist.
  • Wide-leg.

We held close to what we know when crafting these cords: incredible quality, long-lasting durability and great style. Designed using soft-washed wide-wale corduroy, our iconic L.L.Bean hardware and tried-and-true designs that stand out from the rest.

  • Garment washed for softness and lived-in appeal.
  • Wide nine-wale corduroy in 99% cotton with 1% elastane for comfort all day long.
  • Machine wash and dry.
  • Five-pocket utility styling.
Rated 5 out of 5 by from So comfortable! Excited they fit so well! Love them. I loved cords when I was younger!
Date published: 2026-03-23
Rated 4 out of 5 by from I bought these pants about a month ago. Very comfortable and fit nicely.
Date published: 2026-03-20
Rated 4 out of 5 by from LCJNC Enjoyed the fit, they were comfortableand the length was accurate.
Date published: 2026-03-18
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Corduroy wide leg jeans I love corduroy pants. Please keep selling them. I appreciate your quality. I should have ordered "regular" instead of "petite". . They were just a little shorter than I like. I'm 5'2" and regular length is usually very long on me
Date published: 2026-03-05
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Cool and comfy I wear these whenever I want to feel comfortable and kinda hip. Which is frequently! They wash and fit me well.
Date published: 2026-03-01
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Great change from jeans I bought 2 pairs of these one loden and the other in khaki, they fit perfectly, look good and a nice change from jeans. Not too wide in the leg, pockets roomy, all around nice switch. Gonna get a pair of navy.
Date published: 2026-02-28
Rated 3 out of 5 by from Fell short I have purchased llbean shoes and outerwear repeatedly and have always been pleased. I thought I would try these pants because the style is exactly what I was looking for. I ordered my normal size and the pants are too short! I am an average height and never have to purchase long pants. It's almost as if instead of adding inches to make the high waist they just kept the same calculations.. very disappointing because quality and everything else would have been perfect.
Date published: 2026-02-27
Rated 4 out of 5 by from Slightly Snug Stylish Vintage Corduroy Bought 2nd pair in a different color, gifted to a friend who loved the 1st pair. She loved the style, fit, quality and comfort of the 1st pair. Problem with the 2nd pair was the fit. Both pair the same size. 2nd pair quite snug. Perhaps a different manufacturer? Otherwise would have rated a 5.
Date published: 2026-02-22
  • y_2026, m_4, d_1, h_12
  • bvseo_bulk, prod_bvrr, vn_bulk_3.0.43
  • cp_1, bvpage1
  • co_hasreviews, tv_0, tr_313
  • loc_en_CA, sid_P-130208, prod, sort_[SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING)]
  • clientName_llbeanca
  • bvseo_sdk, dw_cartridge, 21.1.0, p_sdk_3.2.0
  • CLOUD, getReviews, 7ms
  • reviews, product