FREE SHIPPING with C$ 100 Purchase 
- Straight leg.
- Standard Athletic Fit: Sits lower on waist.
- Straight with added ease through hip and thigh.
Men's Riverton Pants, Standard Athletic Fit, Straight Leg
FREE Shipping with C$ 100 Purchase
Color:
Dark Ash
Please select color
Waist:
Please select waist
Inseam:
Please select inseam
Limited quantity
More information is needed.
Please select:
In-store Availability: Select options (ex.: size or color)
Product Details
These versatile utility pants combine the best of chinos and jeans and add even more comfort, making them ideal for casual work days and all-around wear. Made of rugged stretch canvas in a moisture-wicking cotton blend, with plenty of pockets for essentials.
- Rugged cotton-blend canvas dries faster than pure cotton for improved comfort.
- A hint of stretch lets you move freely.
- 57% cotton, 41% nylon, 2% Lycra® spandex.
- Machine wash and dry.
- Seven pockets, including front watch pocket, front drop-in pocket and back zippered security pocket.
- Triple-needle stitching for extra durability.
- Articulated knees and a gusseted crotch allow free movement.
- Reinforced cuffs.
- Antiqued brass shanks and rivets.
- Wide belt loops and locker loop inside waist.
Rated 1 out of
5
by
JJDD from
Bring Back the Original Riverton Pants
Perhaps the average review of 2.2 out of 5 sends a clear message that the new Riverton pants are not the original Riverton pants that were were a favorite of many LL Bean customers. The original Riverton pants are the only pants I have worn for well over 7 years as they were well made and fit perfectly. As one of my original 4 pairs was finally showing their age I tried on the new Riverton's to find that they in no way resembled the originals either in fit or quality. BRING BACK THE ORIGINAL RIVERTON'S and I will be the first to purchase at least another four pair even at a premimum as I live in Canada and will continue to support LL Bean for many years to come.
Date published: 2025-12-27
Rated 1 out of
5
by
Peter from
Shouldn’t have changed them
I used to wear Riverside pants all the time, then the design changed. I see that everyone complains about this. Don’t mess with success! I don’t buy them anymore, have moved on to other pants. Not as good. I have three pairs left, I wear them carefully, sigh
Date published: 2025-12-27
Rated 2 out of
5
by
Raymond from
Poor fit
The cut was wrong for both the waist (too tight) and inseam (too long). This was a letdown, since I usually fit 32-32 cut pants very well.
Date published: 2025-12-27
Rated 2 out of
5
by
Matt from
Tight inseam
Great pants, but with a weird cut. Very tight in the inseam. Highly recommended if your goal is to make wine.
Date published: 2025-12-19
Rated 1 out of
5
by
John H from
Please Bring Back!
I tried the new Riverton pants...sent back. Shallow pockets, moved my fav cell phone pocket. Don't fit same. I LOVE the old style, EVERYTHING about them and they are my go-to everyday pants. I'm currently rotating the three pair I own, praying they last a LONG time and praying that you go back to the great original design.
Date published: 2025-12-16
Rated 2 out of
5
by
C Lee from
Waist fits MUCH larger than ever before
My usual size for years has been 32/29. Length is OK but waist would easily fit 33.5-34 inches. I wish clothes manufacturers would truthfully hold the line on specifications and not expand sizing as if tape measures were rubber bands.
Date published: 2025-12-07
Rated 1 out of
5
by
Camper X from
Should not be called "Riverton" Pants
The design was changed so customers ordering thinking they're getting the great product they used to get are going to be disappointed. I have been a loyal L.L. Bean Customer for 40 years and have bought Canoes, camping gear, a solo stove and loads of clothes and gifts. Not sure what happened.....L.L. Bean that I knew listened to their customers and based on the reviews for this product that is a thing of the past.
Date published: 2025-12-02
Rated 5 out of
5
by
SBrown from
Solid work pant!
Fits true to size and very comfortable. Highly recommended.
Date published: 2025-11-29
